Trend
N/ATrend evidence is visible, but no validated trend model score is stored for this opportunity.
Edge Pulse
Pulse Markets
One market, one evidence review, one clear next step.
Current score
62/100
Confidence
N/A
Pulse rank
#39
Pulse verdict
Pulse has no confirmed directional control, price is discount, auction is balancing, control is bears active. Some conditions align, but the full opportunity has not reached top quality.
Why Pulse found this opportunity
The score is a transparent research ranking. It is not a buy or sell signal, and the decision remains yours.
Market health
Watch
Current regime
Balancing
Exchange
Bybit
News impact
Not assessed
Trend evidence is visible, but no validated trend model score is stored for this opportunity.
Auction evidence is visible, but no validated auction model score is stored for this opportunity.
Liquidity evidence is visible, but no validated liquidity model score is stored for this opportunity.
Participation evidence is visible, but no validated participation model score is stored for this opportunity.
Structure evidence is visible, but no validated structure model score is stored for this opportunity.
Momentum evidence is visible, but no validated momentum model score is stored for this opportunity.
Volatility evidence is visible, but no validated volatility model score is stored for this opportunity.
Risk evidence is visible, but no validated risk model score is stored for this opportunity.
Sellers remain active around value.
Control state flips against the current structure.
HTF and LTF bias lose alignment.
Auction fails to continue accepting around key value levels.
Higher and lower timeframe trend evidence disagrees.
Yesterday
Previous Pulse 60/100
Today
Opportunity 62/100
Why the score changed
Historical comparison is shown only when both snapshots use comparable model and weight versions. Legacy scanner scores are not presented as modular score changes.
Study controls
Change timeframe, save the market or place it in today's shortlist.
Free access unlocked: 1H. Upgrade to Pro for 15M and 1D, or Elite for the full timeframe ladder.
Opportunity Chart
INFQUSDT.P 1H - Neutral - Watch - Discount
VAH
13.88
POC
12.83
VAL
12.66
Decision Evidence
Sellers remain active around value.
Control state flips against the current structure.
HTF and LTF bias lose alignment.
Auction fails to continue accepting around key value levels.
HTF Bias
Bullish Trend
LTF Bias
Bearish Trend
Auction
Balancing
Control
Bears Active
Live price
12.74
Movement
-35
Generated analysis or suggestion. INFQUSDT.P is currently classified as a Watch scanner setup on 1H with an Radar Score of 62. Price is trading in discount, where buyers often look for value if auction behavior supports acceptance. 1H chart structure is balancing, so acceptance and rejection around value matter more than assuming continuation. Higher-timeframe and lower-timeframe structure are mixed, which means the market requires more confirmation before directional conviction improves. Auction behavior is balancing, meaning the market is not currently showing strong directional expansion. Control currently favors sellers. The current Radar Score is 62, placing this market in watchlist territory rather than a high-quality structure. A constructive auction path would be discount participation holding, then rotation toward POC and potentially value area high if buyers maintain control. Framework summary: chart bias is Balancing, location is Discount, HTF bias is Bullish Trend, LTF bias is Bearish Trend, auction state is Balancing, and control state is Bears Active. This thesis is educational only and does not provide entries, stops, targets, signals, or trade recommendations. Supporting evidence: symbol INFQUSDT.P; timeframe 1H; chart bias Balancing; location Discount; HTF bias Bullish Trend; LTF bias Bearish Trend; auction state Balancing; control state Bears Active.
What Changed
Pulse changed score 60 to 62
31 Aug, 01:32
Pulse changed score 47 to 60
31 Aug, 01:18
Pulse changed score 62 to 47
31 Aug, 01:02
Pulse changed score 60 to 62
31 Aug, 00:47
Compare Three Alternatives